HOME > WHO WE SERVE > Site Safety Coordinators
Reducing Measured Noise Exposure at the Source
We engineer the measured exposure down at the source, then document a hearing conservation program that holds up in an OSHA audit, not just a bin of earplugs.
The Limits of a PPE-First Program
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 sets the requirement plainly. When employee exposure crosses the permissible exposure limit, feasible engineering and administrative controls come first. Personal protective equipment fills the gap those controls cannot close. It is the last line, not the first.
Hand a worker earplugs and the noise is still there. The hazard has not been removed, it has been transferred to a fit that depends on training, wear time, and the worker doing everything right on every shift. Audits and claims read that as unresolved exposure.
On a hearing-loss claim or an OSHA inspection, the first question is not whether a program existed. It is whether feasible engineering controls were identified and exhausted before the company fell back on protection. A binder full of earplug sign-offs does not answer that question.
A defensible program follows the hierarchy of controls in order. It documents the measured exposure, the engineering options considered, what was installed, and the exposure after the work. It shows a good-faith effort to lower the number, not a decision to manage around it with PPE.
That paper trail is only credible if the number actually moved. A program that measures, prescribes protection, and re-measures nothing proves only that the exposure was recorded. Lowering the measured level at the source is what turns the file from an exposure record into a defense.
Hand a worker earplugs and the noise is still there. The hazard has not been removed, it has been transferred to a fit that depends on training, wear time, and the worker doing everything right on every shift. Audits and claims read that as unresolved exposure.
On a hearing-loss claim or an OSHA inspection, the first question is not whether a program existed. It is whether feasible engineering controls were identified and exhausted before the company fell back on protection. A binder full of earplug sign-offs does not answer that question.
A defensible program follows the hierarchy of controls in order. It documents the measured exposure, the engineering options considered, what was installed, and the exposure after the work. It shows a good-faith effort to lower the number, not a decision to manage around it with PPE.
That paper trail is only credible if the number actually moved. A program that measures, prescribes protection, and re-measures nothing proves only that the exposure was recorded. Lowering the measured level at the source is what turns the file from an exposure record into a defense.
Common Challenges We Solve.
Workers over the action level with only earplugs standing between them and a claim
An OSHA inspection asking what engineering controls you tried before PPE
Dosimetry data that is old, spotty, or never tied to specific tasks
A hearing conservation program on paper that has never lowered a measured level
New equipment or a line change that pushed exposure past the limit
Insurers and legal asking for proof the exposure came down, not just PPE records
Engineering Controls Come Before PPE
Site Safety Coordinators
What an OSHA Audit Examines
Earplugs and muffs have a place. They protect the worker while controls are engineered and after residual noise remains. What they do not do is satisfy the standard on their own, because 1910.95 treats them as the fallback when controls are not feasible.
An inspector or a plaintiff's expert walks the hierarchy of controls backward. Did you measure the exposure. Were engineering controls feasible. Were they installed. If the answer stops at issued PPE and a fit-test log, the program reads as incomplete.
Feasibility is the pivot. OSHA expects engineering controls where they are technologically and economically achievable, and it has cited employers who relied on protection when a control existed. The burden is on the site to show it looked and acted, not just distributed.
That is why the documentation matters as much as the hardware. A defensible file shows the measured exposure, the controls evaluated, the ones installed, and the level after. It answers the audit's real question before it is asked, and it holds under a claim.
An inspector or a plaintiff's expert walks the hierarchy of controls backward. Did you measure the exposure. Were engineering controls feasible. Were they installed. If the answer stops at issued PPE and a fit-test log, the program reads as incomplete.
Feasibility is the pivot. OSHA expects engineering controls where they are technologically and economically achievable, and it has cited employers who relied on protection when a control existed. The burden is on the site to show it looked and acted, not just distributed.
That is why the documentation matters as much as the hardware. A defensible file shows the measured exposure, the controls evaluated, the ones installed, and the level after. It answers the audit's real question before it is asked, and it holds under a claim.
Site Safety Coordinators
Measuring Exposure to OSHA Requirements
Compliance turns on the worker's real dose, not a spot reading with a sound level meter across the room. Personal dosimetry rides on the employee through the shift and captures what the ear actually takes in as tasks, positions, and machines change.
Those readings roll up into a time-weighted average and get checked against the OSHA permissible exposure limit and the action level in 1910.95. The TWA is the number an inspector asks for, and it decides who enters the hearing conservation program.
A single overall number tells you there is a problem, not how to fix it. Octave-band analysis breaks the noise into frequencies, which shows where the energy sits and what a control has to attenuate. That is the difference between guessing and engineering.
We run all of it with NIST-traceable Class 1 instrumentation, so the data stands up to scrutiny. The assessment tells you who is exposed, at what level, in which bands, and against which limit. That baseline is what every control and every audit response is built on.
Those readings roll up into a time-weighted average and get checked against the OSHA permissible exposure limit and the action level in 1910.95. The TWA is the number an inspector asks for, and it decides who enters the hearing conservation program.
A single overall number tells you there is a problem, not how to fix it. Octave-band analysis breaks the noise into frequencies, which shows where the energy sits and what a control has to attenuate. That is the difference between guessing and engineering.
We run all of it with NIST-traceable Class 1 instrumentation, so the data stands up to scrutiny. The assessment tells you who is exposed, at what level, in which bands, and against which limit. That baseline is what every control and every audit response is built on.
Site Safety Coordinators
Our Approach & Capabilities
Memtech runs the full occupational-noise loop. We assess the exposure, design the engineering controls that lower it at the source and along the path, coordinate the install, and validate the result, so your hearing conservation program is defensible and the measured level comes down.
Our capabilities include:
- Room acoustic modeling and reverberation time optimization
- Sound isolation analysis and partition design (STC/IIC improvement)
- Speech privacy and sound masking system design
- Vibration control for mechanical and structural systems
- Material selection that meets both performance targets and finish standards
- Installation coordination and post-completion verification testing
Site Safety Coordinators
Worksites We Assess and Treat
Occupational noise crosses the OSHA action level on nearly every industrial worksite. We run dosimetry and design engineering controls across the operations below, matching each assessment to how the work actually generates sound.
- Construction sites: heavy equipment, impact tools, and concrete operations near crews
- Manufacturing and assembly plants: production lines running above the action level
- Warehousing and distribution: forklifts, conveyors, and dock equipment across shifts
- Quarries and aggregate: crushers, screens, and haul equipment at sustained exposure
- Food and beverage processing: fillers, packaging lines, and compressors running continuously
- Automotive and heavy equipment: test cells, engines, and assembly noise
- Chemical and process plants: pumps, compressors, and flare and vent noise
- Wood and paper mills: saws, chippers, and dryers driving sustained levels
- Maintenance and mechanical shops: grinders, air tools, and bench operations
Site Safety Coordinators
Engineering Controls That Lower Exposure
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 and the hierarchy of controls put engineering controls above hearing protection. Yet most programs stop at earplugs. Engineering controls lower the sound level at the source and along the path, so the exposure itself drops rather than being masked.
At the source we enclose or isolate the machine driving the exposure. An acoustic enclosure, a barrier, or a vibration mount cuts the emitted sound level before it reaches the operator, measured in octave bands so the treatment targets the frequencies that carry the energy.
Along the path we break the route the sound travels to the worker. Absorptive treatment on walls and ceilings reduces reflected sound, and barrier walls or curtains block the direct line between the equipment and the workstations recording the highest TWA.
Engineering controls work every shift without a worker remembering to wear them. A fitted enclosure or barrier does not slip, get removed, or lose its rating over a break. The exposure comes down and stays down, which is what a defensible program has to prove.
At the source we enclose or isolate the machine driving the exposure. An acoustic enclosure, a barrier, or a vibration mount cuts the emitted sound level before it reaches the operator, measured in octave bands so the treatment targets the frequencies that carry the energy.
Along the path we break the route the sound travels to the worker. Absorptive treatment on walls and ceilings reduces reflected sound, and barrier walls or curtains block the direct line between the equipment and the workstations recording the highest TWA.
Engineering controls work every shift without a worker remembering to wear them. A fitted enclosure or barrier does not slip, get removed, or lose its rating over a break. The exposure comes down and stays down, which is what a defensible program has to prove.
Site Safety Coordinators
Documentation for Audits and Claims
On a hearing-loss claim or an OSHA audit, the first question is not whether a program existed. It is whether engineering controls were tried before the employer fell back on PPE. A PPE-first record is an exposure document, not a defense.
We document the baseline first: personal dosimetry per worker, octave-band analysis of the space, and each TWA measured against the OSHA permissible exposure limit and the NIOSH REL. Those records establish who was over the action level and by how much, dated and traceable.
Next we record the engineering controls evaluated and installed, with the design intent and the expected insertion loss for each. The file shows the employer moved up the hierarchy of controls and acted on the measurements, not that it stopped at handing out earplugs.
Then we validate. Post-install dosimetry and octave-band measurement confirm the exposure actually dropped, with before-and-after numbers on the same instrumentation. That closes the loop an auditor or insurer looks for: a measured problem, a control, and a measured result that holds.
We document the baseline first: personal dosimetry per worker, octave-band analysis of the space, and each TWA measured against the OSHA permissible exposure limit and the NIOSH REL. Those records establish who was over the action level and by how much, dated and traceable.
Next we record the engineering controls evaluated and installed, with the design intent and the expected insertion loss for each. The file shows the employer moved up the hierarchy of controls and acted on the measurements, not that it stopped at handing out earplugs.
Then we validate. Post-install dosimetry and octave-band measurement confirm the exposure actually dropped, with before-and-after numbers on the same instrumentation. That closes the loop an auditor or insurer looks for: a measured problem, a control, and a measured result that holds.
Site Safety Coordinators
Engineering Controls We Supply and Install
We specify each control from the octave-band data, then supply and install it. The right control depends on the source, the frequency content, and the path to the worker, so the treatment below is matched to the measured exposure, not pulled off a shelf.
- Acoustic machine enclosures that contain the source at its loudest point
- Barrier walls and curtains blocking the direct path to workers
- Pipe and duct lagging that wraps noise carried through systems
- Silencers and mufflers on intakes, exhausts, and vent openings
- Vibration isolation that cuts structure-borne noise at the mount
- Absorptive wall and ceiling treatment that reduces reflected sound
- Acoustic control rooms and operator booths that lower occupied-area exposure
Featured Case Study
A Defensible Hearing Conservation Program
A manufacturing plant had workers over the OSHA action level and a program built on hearing protection alone. Memtech Acoustics ran personal dosimetry and octave-band analysis, identified the sources driving each worker's TWA, designed and installed engineering controls that lowered the measured exposure at the source, and documented a program that holds up under audit.
Highlights
- Personal dosimetry and octave-band analysis established each worker's TWA against OSHA 1910.95
- Sources ranked by TWA contribution, so the highest-impact noise got treated first
- Engineering controls lowered measured exposure at the source, not just behind PPE
- Post-install validation and calibration records produced an audit-ready, defensible program file
Trusted By
Safety and EHS teams bring in Memtech Acoustics when PPE alone will not survive an audit and exposure has to come down.
Memtech Acoustics supports manufacturers and industrial employers on occupational-noise and hearing-conservation programs across Michigan and the Midwest.
NIST-traceable Class 1 instrumentation · OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 methodology · 25+ years · 2,000+ projects
NIST-traceable Class 1 instrumentation · OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 methodology · 25+ years · 2,000+ projects
Why Memtech Acoustics?
- Precision Over Guesswork
We begin with by acquiring comprehensive data at your location. Our designs are not based on assumptions. - Full-Service, No Shortcuts
We’re Michigan’s only full-service firm. We design it, source it, and install it. - Certified Experts, Not Salespeople
Your project is led by engineers and trained acoustical analysts. We speak the language of results and compliance. - Consultative, Not Cookie-Cutter
No two environments are the same. We tailor every solution around your space, constraints, and business goals. - Quiet With Great Aesthetics
From conference rooms to corporate headquarters, our solutions are as aesthetically refined as they are acoustically effective.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How do you measure worker noise exposure?
Memtech Acoustics runs personal dosimetry worn by the worker across a full shift, then adds area sound-level surveys and octave-band analysis at each source. Dosimetry produces the 8-hour TWA that OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 is judged against. Octave-band data tells us which frequencies to treat. Area readings alone cannot prove a personal exposure.
Does OSHA accept a PPE-only hearing conservation program?
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.95 requires feasible engineering and administrative controls when exposures exceed the permissible exposure limit, with hearing protection covering the gap that remains. A PPE-first program documents exposure without reducing it. On a hearing-loss claim or an audit, the first question is whether engineering controls were exhausted, not whether protectors were issued.
How do engineering controls actually lower the measured exposure?
Engineering controls attack noise at the source and along the path, so the number comes down before PPE is counted. Memtech Acoustics designs enclosures, barriers, absorptive treatment, damping, and isolation matched to the octave-band signature of each source. Because we design to the measured spectrum, the installed control delivers the insertion loss the assessment called for.
What documentation do you provide for an audit or a hearing-loss claim?
Memtech Acoustics delivers a full assessment record: dosimetry results, TWA calculations against the OSHA action level and PEL, octave-band data, instrument calibration traceable to NIST, the control design, and post-install validation showing the exposure came down. That package is a defense document, proving engineering controls were assessed and applied, not just that a program existed.
Can you assess an active, operating plant without shutting it down?
Yes, and we prefer it. Occupational-noise exposure has to be measured under real production conditions, so dosimetry rides the worker through a normal shift while machines run. Memtech Acoustics coordinates with your EHS team to work around production and capture representative tasks. Shutting the line down would falsify the exposure data.
How fast do we get results back?
Memtech Acoustics returns preliminary dosimetry and TWA findings within days of the site visit. The full report, with octave-band analysis and control recommendations, typically follows inside two to three weeks, scaled to the workers and sources sampled. If an audit or claim deadline is driving the schedule, tell us up front and we sequence to it.
Do you only test, or do you design and install the controls too?
Both. Testing that ends at a report leaves the exposure exactly where it was. Memtech Acoustics runs the assessment, designs the engineering controls to the measured octave-band data, sources and installs them, then validates the exposure came down. On full-package work we back the performance target, so the follow-up number is one we stand behind.
How do you decide which noise sources to treat first?
We rank sources by how much each one drives the worker's TWA, not by how loud it seems. Octave-band data at every source, combined with time spent near it, shows where treatment moves the exposure most per dollar. Memtech Acoustics treats the sources that pull the most workers under the action level first, then works down the list.
How is this priced?
Memtech Acoustics prices by scope and phase, not by the hour, so you have the number before work starts. An assessment is priced on the workers and sources sampled. A control design-and-install package is a defined fee tied to the exposure target and the sources treated. The engineering fee is what makes the validated result possible.
What do you need from us to get started?
Send any current noise survey or dosimetry, a floor plan or equipment list, worker counts by area, and the shift pattern. That tells Memtech Acoustics where exposure likely exceeds the action level and how to sample it. No prior data is fine. We start with a baseline dosimetry and octave-band survey. Most engagements begin within a week.
Let’s Engineer the Right Solution, Together.
Let's Get Started. Contact Us.
Talk to our experts. We’ll assess your needs and recommend a solution that works for your project.
